Page 7 - BACC Report
P. 7

Draft Report on European Baccalaureate 2020
               The members of the Board of Inspectors agreed with the expert that it was not advisable to
               apply a uniform reduction of mark for all the pupils for the following reasons:

                   1.     Statistical reasons: the distribution of final marks would result distorted, so that one
                          of the main objectives of the moderation would not be achieved.
                   2.     Students at the bottom of the scale: 44 pupils would fail instead of 27, or 17 pupils
                          would be artificially given the minimum passing mark, so that the moderation would
                          not any longer be uniform anyway.
                   3.     Best students: only 28 would remain in the 95-100 range.

               Consequently, the members of the Board agreed that gradual moderation at the extremes of
               the distribution should be preferred, as formerly agreed.
               This approach, staying within the frame set by the Board of Governors at its meeting on 15 –
               17 April 2020, was supported by all members of the Board of Inspectors Secondary Cycle and
               approved  by  the  Chairman  of  the  2020  European  Baccalaureate  session  and  can  be
               summarized as follows:

               Gradual moderation applied, through a formula, to all students (except the top scoring one
               and those having less than 60), with a maximum drop of 1,5.
               It is worth underlining that even with the applied moderation, the average mark remains higher
               than in previous years, and so is the number of pupils with the highest marks.

               As  a  consequence,  on  22  June  2020  pupils  received  their  marks  which  were  calculated
               according the Bac mark formula and the Decision of the Board of Governors from 15-17 April
               2020 (20% A1, 20% A2, 30% B1, 30% B2 which is a replication of B1). The detailed formula
               used for moderation is presented in Annex I.

               This results in a situation that the overall final mark is not simply an average of the final subject
               marks, but also taking into consideration the necessary moderation which was agreed at the
               possibly lowest level, at the same time not threatening the reputation of the European Schools
               and the European Baccalaureate and thus, most important, not affecting the credibility of the
               diploma delivered to the EB candidates.

               The  whole  process  was  explained  in  more  details  in  Annex  1  of  this  document:  FINAL
               REPORT  ON  THE  MODERATION  METHOD  FOR  THE  EUROPEAN  BACCALAUREATE
               MARKS IN 2020 (Ref.: 2020-07-D-2-en-1)

               The decision of the Board of Governors has allowed all EB candidates to request to sit the full
               EB session in autumn (or alternatively to repeat the year), shall they be unsatisfied with the
               obtained result (due to moderation or any other reason).

               More details regarding the extraordinary session in September can be found later in this report
               in a separate chapter focus on that.


















                 2020-08-D-2-en-1                                                                     Page 7 of 79
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12